The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined the Lloyds Banking Group a record fine of £28 million pounds for serious failings in their control over sales incentives schemes. This means that sales staff were under pressure to reach sales targets for fear of demotion or dismissal.
Investigation revealed that a member of staff under pressure sold investment products to himself and his entire family in order to meet targets. This pressure allowed for serious failings to the consumer who had unnecessary products sold to them, that they may not have needed or required. This resulted in the largest fine on record for mis-selling investments.
FCA fines Lloyds Banking Group firms a total of £28,038,800
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Bank of Scotland plc, both part of Lloyds Banking Group (LBG), £28,038,800 for serious failings in their controls over sales incentive schemes. The failings affected branches of Lloyds TSB, Bank of Scotland and Halifax (which is part of Bank of Scotland).
This is the largest ever fine imposed by the FCA, or its predecessor the Financial Services Authority (FSA), for retail conduct failings.
The incentive schemes led to a serious risk that sales staff were put under pressure to hit targets to get a bonus or avoid being demoted, rather than focus on what consumers may need or want. In one instance an adviser sold protection products to himself, his wife and a colleague to prevent himself from being demoted.
Tracey McDermott, the FCA’s director of enforcement and financial crime, commented:
“The findings do not make pleasant reading. Financial incentive schemes are an important indicator of what management values and a key influence on the culture of the organisation, so they must be designed with the customer at the heart. The review of incentive schemes that we published last year makes it quite clear that this is something to which we expect all firms to adhere.
“Customers have a right to expect better from our leading financial institutions and we expect firms to put customers first – but firms will never be able to do this if they incentivise their staff to do the opposite.
“Because there have been numerous warnings to the industry about the importance of managing incentives schemes, and because Lloyds TSB had been fined in 2003 for unsuitable sales of bonds, we have increased the fine by ten per cent.
“Both Lloyds TSB and Bank of Scotland have made substantial changes, and the reviews of sales and the redress now being made should right many of these wrongs.”
The FCA found that both firms had higher risk features in their advisers’ financial incentive schemes which were not properly controlled. This created a significant risk that advisers would maintain or increase their salaries, and earn bonuses, by selling products to customers that they did not need or want.
The FCA increased the fine by 10 per cent because:
The previous regulator, the FSA, had warned about the use of poorly managed incentive schemes over a number of years; and The firms’ previous disciplinary record, including an FSA fine on Lloyds TSB Bank plc for the unsuitable sale of bonds in 2003 caused in part by the general pressure to meet sales targets.
The FCA has an objective to protect consumers and the changes made by the firms since the investigation will help ensure their customers are treated better in future. The FCA expects all financial incentive schemes to be designed carefully with good customer outcomes in mind, and the risks they pose must be identified and managed properly.
Both firms have agreed to carry out a review of higher risk advisers’ sales and pay redress where unsuitable sales took place. It is not yet possible to say how much redress will be paid until the firms have identified how many customers are affected. Customers do not need to take any action at this stage to be included in the review and they will be contacted by the firm in due course.
More detail on the FCA’s investigation
The FCA’s investigation focused on advised sales of investment products (such as share ISAs) and protection products (such as critical illness or income protection) between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2012.
During this period:
Lloyds TSB advisers sold more than 630,000 products to over 399,000 customers, who invested about £1.2bn and paid £71m in protection premiums.
Halifax advisers sold over 380,000 products to more than 239,000 customers, who invested around £888m and paid £38m in protection premiums.
Bank of Scotland advisers sold over 84,000 products to over 54,000 customers, who invested around £170m and paid £9m in protection premiums.
The incentive schemes rewarded advisers through variable base salaries, individual and team bonuses and one-off payments and prizes.
Systems and controls used by the firms to manage the incentive schemes were inadequate. While advisers were required to meet certain competency standards to be eligible for promotions and bonuses, this control was seriously flawed and seven out of ten advisers at Lloyds TSB and three out of ten at Halifax still received their monthly bonus even though a high proportion of sales were found – by the firms themselves – to be unsuitable or potentially unsuitable. Further, 229 advisers at Lloyds TSB received a bonus even when all of their assessed sales were deemed unsuitable or potentially unsuitable; and 30 advisers received a bonus in the same circumstances on more the one occasion.
The managers that were responsible for ensuring good practice by advisers also had their own performance measured against sales targets – a clear conflict of interest that needed careful management.
The FCA recognises that firms may want to incentivise staff to sell but the risks inherent in any incentive scheme, however well designed, must be managed. In this case the scheme presented significant risks but the firms did not ensure that their systems and controls were sufficient to mitigate those risks.
In September 2012 the FSA published a review into sales incentives, highlighting some of the poor practices used by firms across the retail market including some of the UK’s biggest financial institutions. One institution was referred to enforcement and the FCA can confirm that was LBG.
The FCA is currently conducting follow up work to see if firms are now managing the risks to consumers from sales based incentives and plans to publish the findings in the first quarter of 2014.
The firms agreed to settle at an early stage and therefore qualified for a 20 per cent discount. Without the discount the total fine would have been £35,048,556.
Original FCA Report : www.fca.org.uk/fca-fines-lloyds
News for Mis-Sold Investments
HSBC investigated over potential Investment Mis-selling
HSBC has set aside £93 million after a shopping excercise conducted by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) revealed the potential mis-selling of investments to customers.
The Mystery shopper experince by the FCA in a Local HSBC branch has resulted in the HSBC investigating an astonishing 200,000 investments that were sold in Branch to customers. These investment need to be investigated for mis-selling says the FCA.
New Barclays Libor Rate Fixing Allegations Emerge in Court
A current lawsuit has emerged that is bringing to light many of the details regarding the continuing Libor rate fixing scandal. The scandal is a part of an interest rate manipulation that is being investigated within several of the world’s largest banking institutions. Barclays is among the banks that have been investigated for insider benchmark interest rate manipulations. A current court case against Barclays has indicated that insider interest rate changes were made in order to gain a significant monetary profit.
Mis-sold Investments see’s two financial advisers banned by FCA
Two financial advisers have been banned by the FCA from holding a position in a financial firm for mis-sold financial investments. The two financial advisers were also fined a total of £885,000. Mark Bentley-Leek and Mustafa Dervish, who were both directors of Bentley Leek Financial Management, were found by the regulator to have lacked integrity and to have misled clients as investments they recommended
Mis-Sold Investments – Midlands, UK
Maple Leaf Financial have a specialist team of solicitors dedicated to dealing with mis-sold investments from, PEP’s, ISA’s, whole life policies, see list below. We are happy to review these Investment products and to claim compensation for our clients where appropriate.
Each investment case is different and they are all assessed individually. Sometimes we can claim because investments were simply unsuitable and they were mis-sold. In other cases it may be because of technical shortcomings in contracts, regulatory issues or a combination of these factors.
Tim Capper reports on Financial Mis-Selling for Maple Leaf Financial. Our aim is to ensure you get honest advice and proper guidance to ensure a suitable recommendation can be made to pursue a financial claim
Latest posts by Tim Capper (see all)
- PPI Claims Currently Show No Sign of Slowing Down - December 10, 2014
- Swaps (IRHP) Determining the Level of Redress - November 3, 2014
- FCA updates PPI redress for 2.5 million old PPI complaints - October 27, 2014